top of page
Search
Writer's pictureMuhammad Rehman

Vivo X200 Pro Display and Battery Life Review

The X200 Genius is outfitted with an OLED show that is obviously great to such an extent that you'd battle to track down something to whine about. It's a high-revive rate LTPO board that can go as high as 120Hz (minor stuff), yet in addition as low as 0.1Hz (invigorate like clockwork). There's additionally high-recurrence 2160Hz PWM diminishing utilized so even the people who are more delicate to flashing ought to be fine at low brightnesses.



The 6.78-inch show has the very goal as that on the X100 Genius - 1,280x2,800 - not the most well-known numbers and marginally lower than the X100 Ultra's appropriate 1,440p. It's still bounty sharp, obviously, with a pixel thickness of 452ppi.



In the telephone's item pages, vivo claims a greatest pinnacle neighborhood splendor of 4,500nits. In our own normalized arrangement, we estimated somewhat over 2,000nits in auto brilliance mode with the telephone under splendid surrounding light. It's a critical move forward from the X100 Master, a step over the X100 Ultra, and perhaps of the greatest number we've seen (however the Pixels truly do go higher).



Vivo stays moderate with the nits it's allowing you to have while you're setting the splendor physically - the X200 Star just does around 550, while we've generally expected 800-ish from ongoing very good quality telephones (the Pixel 9 Genius XL again doing some serious overachieving here). All things considered, the auto ought to keep you cheerful.



The X200 Ace's specs list a revive rate range somewhere in the range of 0.1Hz and 120Hz. The telephone would promptly change down to 1Hz, as per the Android invigorate rate utility, paying little mind to which of the three revive rate modes was dynamic. We never saw a 0.1Hz perusing, however it's presumably held for consistently in plain view utilizes, where having the device dynamic may be meddling, also we're not precisely certain the pointer can show values underneath 1Hz in any case.



The X200 Genius upholds all major HDR video norms, including HDR10+ and Dolby Vision - that is a move forward from the X100 Ace, which avoided offering Dolby Vision. Fairly shockingly for a Chinese variant telephone, Netflix likewise perceives the X200 Ace as supporting Dolby Vision and HDR10 and will cheerfully play back FullHD streams thanks to the Widevine L1 certificate. HDR in YouTube is likewise upheld.



The telephone likewise upholds the Android Ultra HDR photograph standard for showing HDR photographs with improved tone planning and a brilliance help for features. It works in the in-house exhibition, yet additionally in Google Photographs, and in Chrome - for pictures from other consistent telephones, as well. The X200 Ace is fueled by a 6,000mAh battery, a most welcome move up to the generally bigger than-most 5,400mAh limit of the X100 Master. It's likewise a knock in mAhs contrasted with the X100 Ultra's 5,500mAh spec.



The X200 Genius additionally utilizes the silicon-carbon kind of anode in its battery tech (like the X100 Ultra, and dissimilar to the regular graphite-based X100 Ace), making its single-cell unit passage better in the energy thickness outline and empowering its utilization in conditions with temperatures down to - 20 degrees Celsius. Vivo clearly exhorts against delayed use in such cases, however it's great to realize that your X200 Star will be up for a periodic outrageous use case.



In the more agreeable 20C+ levels of our testing arrangement, the vivo posted pretty extraordinary numbers in our Dynamic Use test. The almost 10 hours of gaming is maybe the most amazing outcome, yet just about 14 hours of web perusing and 19 hours of circling recordings are additionally strong figures.



The X200 Ace is evaluated for 90W of wired accusing and ships of a 90W connector. The single-cell plan of the battery implies you shouldn't expect similar paces you'd get from the double cell X100 Master, for instance - vivo focused on energy thickness over charging speed on this one.



In our testing, the telephone maximized at around 75W briefly at the earliest reference point of the cycle and afterward immediately dropped to something like 35W - not a remarkable way of behaving, it's only that here the drop was sooner and more keen. The maximum watts will just tell you so far at any rate, and it's the genuine time it takes to charge that is important.



The X200 Master finished a void to-full disagreement 46 minutes - not actually class-driving or anything, yet not really awful all things considered. The 73% at the half-hour designated spot is likewise good. Maybe the 6,000mAh limit will cause these numbers to appear noticeably more appealing close to contenders that are quicker to charge, yet have more modest batteries.

Comments


bottom of page